Conversion tracking for financial services, built for the compliance review
Financial services measurement has to survive two audiences: a marketing team that needs attribution and a compliance function that needs to know exactly what leaves the building. Most setups satisfy neither, because nobody has ever written down what parameters are dispatched. The build starts with that inventory, strips personal and financial detail at the server container where you actually control the boundary, and measures the funnel with generic events that carry value but not circumstance.
Free30 minutesNo obligation
Financial services · what breaks
What financial services firms usually run into
- 01
Nobody able to state what data is dispatched
Which makes any compliance review impossible.
- 02
Marketing blocked entirely as a precaution
So nothing is measured at all.
- 03
Long cycles outside attribution windows
The revenue event can't drive bidding.
Financial services · the fix
What changes — Financial services
A written inventory of every dispatched parameter
Reviewable by compliance.
Personal and financial detail stripped
At the server, before dispatch.
A bidable milestone inside the window
So marketing isn't flying blind.
Financial services · architecture
The conversion map for financial services firms
Four generic stages. What makes this vertical different is everything the events deliberately don't contain.
- 1
Enquiry
Browser-side, generic page paths only.
- 2
Application started
No product or amount detail.
- 3
Application submitted
The realistic optimization target.
- 4
Account opened or funded
Server-side with a blended value, not the customer's actual balance.
- 5
Everything descriptive
Stays internal. Segment in your own systems.
Financial services · diagnose
Where financial services firms tracking usually breaks
- 01
Product and amount in the URL
Travelling with every event automatically.
- 02
Session recording capturing form fields
Including income, balances and identifiers. Usually the largest exposure and rarely audited.
- 03
Client-side filtering assumed to be a control
It runs after the data is already inside a third-party script.
- 04
Consent configured but never tested
Denial has to be verified by capture, not read off a dashboard.
Financial services · prove
How the work is proven — Financial services
Source of truth
your own account and application records
- A written inventory of every dispatched parameter, reviewed.
- No personal or financial detail present in any dispatched event.
- Consent denial verified by network capture.
- Applications reconciled against your own records for a closed month.
Financial services · free audit
What we check in the free audit
- Product and amount in the URL
- Session recording capturing form fields
- Client-side filtering assumed to be a control
- Consent configured but never tested
Checked against
your own account and application records
Free30 minutesNo obligation
Financial services · when not to buy
What lands in your monthly report — Financial services
One page a month, in language you can put in front of a compliance officer or a board.
- Applications started and submitted for the month, by channel.
- Cost per submitted application, and per account opened where attributable.
- The current dispatched-parameter inventory, so compliance can re-review it.
- Consent rates and what a denial actually blocks.
Financial services · what we deliver
The flow we build — Financial services
Full outbound parameter inventory
URL, referrer, title, form fields, recording tools.
Server container as the control boundary
Client-side filtering is not a boundary.
Generic conversions with real value
Application submitted, account opened.
Consent enforced and verified by capture
Not by configuration.
Written guarantee
95%+ tracking accuracy
Measured against your own account and application records. Miss it and we keep working at no cost.
From $400 · See packages
FAQ
Financial services questions, answered
Yes, with the personal and financial detail removed. The obstacle is almost never the platform; it's what the page sends by default.
No. It's a technical control supporting a position your compliance function defines. We reduce and document what leaves; we don't certify anything.
Session recording and heatmap tools capturing form fields. Most firms have never audited what those tools record.
Application submitted, generally. It's inside the import window and predicts funded accounts well enough to be useful.
More on Financial services
- Google Ads · Financial servicesGoogle Ads conversion tracking for financial services firms
- Meta · Financial servicesMeta Ads conversion tracking for financial services firms
- TikTok · Financial servicesTikTok Ads conversion tracking for financial services firms
RELATED GUIDES
Funnels, reconciliation and tools for financial services
- Debt reliefConversion tracking for debt relief, measured in enrolled clients
- Workers' compConversion tracking for workers' comp, measured in signed cases
- Meta · Booked call → closed wonHow to track booked call to closed won for Meta Ads
- Google Ads · Booked call → closed wonHow to track booked call to closed won for Google Ads
- Meta × Call RecordsHow to reconcile Meta Ads against your call tracking records
- Adyen → Google AdsConnecting Adyen to Google Ads
- Immigration lawConversion tracking for immigration law, measured in signed cases
- Medical malpracticeConversion tracking for medical malpractice, measured in accepted cases
Free · 30 min
Measure the funnel your compliance team can sign off
WhatsAppFree30 minutesNo obligation
